This week I had opportunity to get my first true high fidelity audio demonstration, courtesy of one of the salesmen at Audio Visions South.
While the demonstration only lasted a little longer than a half hour, the experience definitely got me excited about what is possible with high quality audio components, while at the same time making me realize that I have an enormous journey ahead of me before I can claim to be “knowledgeable” about high fidelity audio.
The salesman that gave me the demonstration, Clarke, began by giving me a little insight into the verbiage used when describing the sound that emanates from an audio system.
Apparently, three of the most important elements of an audio system are its frequency response, dynamic contrast and imaging.
The system’s frequency response has to do with the effectiveness and coordination of the three levels of sound produced by the system — the high range, mid range and bass. In a system that has good frequency response, the highs and mids will remain crisp and clear and will not be drowned out by the bass.
The dynamic contrast of a system concerns its ability to produce music that can change from a high range to low range, and vice versa, in a smooth, musical manner. A system with good dynamic contrast has the ability to produce a wide range of sounds, while maintaining a smooth musicality when transitioning from lows to the highs and back again.
Finally, a system’s imaging is its ability to create an audio “image” of where the instruments are producing music from across the “sound stage.” To help me understand this factor, Clarke said that to judge a system’s imaging abilities, one should envision the band playing live in front of you. Do the vocals sound like they are coming from straight ahead like they would be at a live show? Do the drums sound like they are being played from the rear of the stage? In a perfect example of imaging, the listener should be able to pinpoint where the instruments are being played during the performance.
After explaining those concepts to me, Clarke continued with the demonstration, which he said was going to be a “simple A-to-B comparison” — one of the most common methods of testing out separate components in an audio system. In an A-to-B comparison, the listener is exposed to the same piece of music with all the components of the system kept exactly the same except for the components you are attempting to compare.
For my demonstration, Clarke selected a piece of music by the artist Ryan Adams, which he played on a system consisting of a Linn CD player, a Peachtree Decco integrated amplifier and a set of Klipsch RF-62 loudspeakers. The A-to-B comparison was going to be between two sets of interconnect cables going from a Linn CD player to the Decco.
I have to admit, I had previously been skeptical of the amount of difference the simple changing of cables could make in an audio system. Wow, was I wrong. After four listening sessions — two with each set of cables — it was instantly apparent that one set of cables was noticeably superior to the other.
Using my newfound vocabulary terms, I was able to put into words the differences I heard — at least enough to get my point across that is.
After listening to the short 30 second piece of music on the first set of cables, and then replacing them with the “B” set, I noticed that differences in the system’s frequency response and dynamic contrast became apparent. The music didn’t sound bad when using the “A” set of cables, but when comparing the two, I noticed that the “A” cables made the bass sound more “washed out” and that the acoustic guitar present in the track was noticeable less crisp than when using the “B” cables. Even more noticeable was the difference in the system’s dynamic contrast. After listening to both sets of cables, the range of the vocals in the music seemed noticeable “squished” when using the “A” cables. The “B” cables seemed to allow the music to express higher highs and lower lows, while the vocal performance seemed to have an added spark using the “B” cables.
While my first hi-fi demonstration consisted of only a few 30-second comparisons, I think it’s pretty obvious that I took a lot from it. Never again will I question the ability of such simple components as cables to affect the musical performance of an audio system.
And, while Ryan Adams’ performance is definitely a quality piece of music, maybe next time I’ll get a demonstration using some Beatles or Rolling Stones tracks. That’ll get the blood flowing I’m sure…